bunpav vs Krea AI
bunpav vs Krea AI: a dedicated 3D tool vs. a suite feature
Krea's 3D mode is one feature inside a much larger image/video/3D creative suite, and it runs on third-party underlying models — Hunyuan3D, Trellis, and Tripo have all shown up in its UI — rather than a proprietary engine. bunpav is a dedicated text-or-photo-to-mesh tool with auto-rig in the same pass, but is still in private beta. Here's the honest breakdown.
quick answers
The short version
Does Krea AI have its own 3D model?
No. Krea's 3D generation routes through third-party underlying models — Hunyuan3D, Trellis, and Tripo have all been offered in its UI. You're effectively renting access to other vendors' 3D models through Krea's shared credit system, not a proprietary Krea 3D engine.
Is 3D generation Krea's main product?
No — 3D is one mode inside a much larger multi-modal suite that also covers image generation, video generation, upscaling, and editing. bunpav is a dedicated 3D generation and auto-rig tool with nothing else competing for the same credit pool.
How does Krea's pricing actually work for 3D generations?
Krea sells 'compute units' shared across image, video, AND 3D generation: Free (100 units/day), Basic $9/mo (5,000 units/month), Pro $35/mo, Max $70/mo, Business $200/mo (80,000 units, unlimited team members, SSO, audit logs). Because 3D shares the pool with everything else, the real cost of one 3D generation varies month to month depending on how much image/video work you also did.
Which is more predictable to budget for 3D work specifically?
bunpav, structurally — its credit packs (Starter $9/100, Studio $39/550, Pro $89/1,500) are spent only on text-to-3D and image-to-3D, so a month of 3D generation costs the same regardless of what else you did that month. Krea's compute units compete against your other Krea usage in the same billing period.
side by side
Full comparison
| Dimension | bunpav | Krea AI |
|---|---|---|
| Availability | Private beta, waitlist-gated | Publicly self-serve today |
| Underlying 3D model | Proprietary generation and auto-rig pipeline | Third-party models (Hunyuan3D, Trellis, Tripo) surfaced through Krea's UI |
| Product scope | Dedicated 3D generation and auto-rig tool | 3D is one mode inside a broader image/video/upscaling creative suite |
| Credit economics | Credits spent only on text-to-3D and image-to-3D | Compute units shared across image, video, AND 3D generation |
| Rigging & animation | Auto-rig humanoid/creature skeleton in the same generation pass | No auto-rig; 3D mode is generation-focused, not a game-asset pipeline |
| Free tier | Welcome credits on every account; product still waitlist-gated | 100 compute units/day, reset daily, shared across all modes |
| Paid pricing | Prepaid packs: $9/100, $39/550, $89/1,500 credits, no subscription | Subscription: Basic $9/mo, Pro $35/mo, Max $70/mo, Business $200/mo |
| Export formats | GLB, FBX, OBJ, USDZ, STL | Varies by underlying model — check Krea's current pricing page for per-model export support |
A real capture of bunpav's dedicated 3D workspace — a narrower, purpose-built tool next to Krea's 3D feature living inside a much larger image and video suite.
where bunpav wins
A credit pool that isn't fighting your other work
bunpav's credits are dedicated to text-to-3D and image-to-3D. Krea's compute units are shared across image, video, and 3D — a heavy image-generation month can eat into what's left for 3D.
Auto-rig in the same pass
bunpav rigs a humanoid or creature skeleton as part of generation. Krea's 3D mode is a generation tool, not a game-asset pipeline — there's no bundled rigging step.
where Krea AI wins
You can use it right now
Krea is publicly self-serve today. bunpav is still gated behind a private-beta waitlist, which is the single biggest practical gap between the two right now.
One subscription covers image, video, and 3D
If you already need Krea for image or video work, its 3D mode comes along inside the same plan instead of a separate tool and a separate bill.
who should pick which
Match the tool to the job
Pick Krea AI if
You already use Krea for AI image or video work and want occasional 3D output inside the same subscription, without needing a dedicated game-asset pipeline.
Join the bunpav waitlist if
You want a credit pool dedicated to 3D generation, auto-rig included in the same pass, and don't want your 3D budget competing with unrelated image or video usage.
faq
Questions, answered
What's the main difference between Krea AI and bunpav for 3D work?
Krea's 3D mode is a feature bolted onto a much larger multi-modal suite, and it runs on third-party underlying models (Hunyuan3D, Trellis, Tripo) rather than a proprietary one. bunpav is a dedicated text-or-photo-to-mesh tool with auto-rig built into the same generation pass, but is still in private beta.
Am I actually using Krea's own AI when I generate a 3D model there?
Not necessarily — Krea has offered 3D generation through third-party models like Hunyuan3D, Trellis, and Tripo inside its own interface. You're routing through Krea's UI and credit system to access other vendors' models, not a proprietary Krea 3D engine.
Why does Krea's 3D pricing feel unpredictable?
Because 'compute units' are shared across image, video, and 3D generation. The real cost of one 3D generation depends on how much of your monthly pool you already spent on other Krea features that same billing period — a genuinely different economics model than a dedicated per-3D-credit tool.
Does bunpav offer anything like Krea's broader creative suite?
No. bunpav is focused specifically on text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and auto-rigging for game-ready assets. If you also need AI image or video generation, Krea's bundled suite covers more ground in one subscription.
Can I sign up for bunpav today the way I can with Krea?
Not yet. bunpav is in private beta behind a waitlist at bunpav.com. Krea has been publicly self-serve for a while — that's a real, current gap worth knowing before you plan a project timeline around bunpav.
go deeper